Greetings from Connect One Dynamic Synergies Private Limited.
We
hereby share if we Pre Closure of Attendance by Employers what would be the
impact on Statutory Compliance Many Private Establishments in India resort to
pre-closure of their employee’s attendance cycle, to ease their regular monthly
salary process.
Under this practice, if employee’s attendance cycle is decided
from the 20th day of the previous calendar month to the 19th day of the current
calendar month, employees joining an organization after the 19th day of the
current month, would get paid during the current month itself by processing
supplementary payroll which is in line with the statutory compliance.
If they
are paid only in the subsequent month, it shall be considered as a violation of
Sec 5 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936.
While all eligible employees are
statutorily to be extended with social security coverage under the Employees
Provident Fund & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 and Employees State
Insurance Act, 1948, they ought to be registered with the respective department
from their original date of joining and generate UNIVERSAL ACCOUNT NUMBER (UAN)
under EPFO and INSURED PERSON NUMBER (IP No) under ESIC.
But, in case if these
employee’s wages were not processed during the current calendar month despite
having been employed, there could be a mismatch between the MUSTER ROLL and WAGE
REGISTER which shall be considered as STATUTORY NON COMPLIANCE.
Additionally,
no contribution (Both Employer and Employee share) could be deposited in respect
of such registered employees either under EPF & MP Act, 1952 or under ESI Act,
1948 or under both these Acts as their salary for the current month was not
processed during the current calendar month itself which shall also be
considered as NON COMPLIANCE.
Hence, under both these Act, the employer shall
be statutorily liable for the consequences.
While Sec 5 of Payment of Wages
Act, 1936 mandates payment of wages to employees either within the 7th day of
the succeeding month in case of establishments with less than 1000 employees or
within the 10th day of the succeeding month in case of establishments with more
than 1000 employees.
It is suggested that, supplementary payroll to be
processed during the current calendar month itself in respect of such employees
and remain statutorily complied under all applicable labour legislations of the
country.
Further, both the social security legislations EPF & ESI also
mandates appropriate compliance and remittance of contribution monthly (calendar
month), effective from the original date of joining of an employee in an
establishment. With the aforesaid suggestion, this mandate also could be met in
fulfilling statutory obligations by an employer.
No comments:
Post a Comment